News

Honda and Acura Recall Nearly 125,000 Vehicles Due to Potential Brake Failure

Honda and Acura are recalling almost 125,000 vehicles across numerous model lines due to a part in the brake system that was potentially improperly as...

Hyundai and Kia Recall 570,000 Vehicles Due to Fire Risk and Tell Owners to Park Outside

Hyundai Motor America and Kia America, Inc. are recalling over 570,000 vehicles due to a fire risk and instructing owners to park the cars outside unt...

Krohn & Moss, Ltd. attorneys, Scott M. Cohen and John D. Barker, named 2023 Super Lawyers by Thomson Reuters

Scott M. Cohen and John D. Barker of Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center®️ have been selected as Super Lawyers by Thomson Reuters...

Lemon Law Attorneys in Chula Vista, CA

Owning a car is essential when living here in Chula Vista, CA. Unfortunately, new and used vehicles alike prove to be unreliable all too often. If you...

When Did the Lemon Law Start? A Quick History of the Origin of Lemon Laws

The first Lemon Law was a direct result of an accumulation of consumer complaints from folks who’d purchased defective motor vehicles. In 1975, these ...

What States Have RV Lemon Laws?

RVs, or recreational vehicles, have become increasingly popular in recent years as families seek out alternative ways to travel. Buying a new RV shoul...

Hyundai Issues Second Recall for 2018 Santa Fe Models Due to Potential Engine Fires

Hyundai Motor America is recalling almost 45,000 2018 Santa Fe Sports because of a fire risk in the engine. Hyundai said the ABS module can malfunctio...

Can You Return a New Car? Limitations of Buyer Remorse Laws

There’s nothing worse than buying a new car, only to regret the purchase after the fact. But whether you can return your car will depend on the nature...

Attorneys Kespohl and Singh Defeat BMW, Again | Krohn & Moss

Alexander Migl, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons The victories keep on coming! After just winning in the appellate court 12 days ago, our Florid...

Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® is pleased to comply with state regulations concerning client statements and testimonials:

In order for you to see our client video or read our client statements, please click the green button below. You will be taken directly to the video or client statements.

If you are interested in viewing information about the lawyer/firm’s past results and testimonials about the lawyer/firm, please read and acknowledge the information below.

The information in this section contains information about the lawyer/firm’s past results, testimonials about the lawyer/firm, and statements regarding the lawyer/firm’s quality. The information has not been reviewed or approved by Bar Associations of the states in which the law firm practices.

The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and testimonials have been provided.

All results of cases handled by the lawyer/firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.

The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by the lawyer/firm or of the experience of all clients or others with the lawyer/firm. Past results are no guarantee of future results. Every case is different, and each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.

The testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.