Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® Wins Jury Award in Defective Cadillac Case Against General Motors, LLC

CHICAGO, IL–(Marketwire – Apr 19, 2011) – A consumer from downstate Bloomington, Illinois received a jury verdict against General Motors, LLC (“GM”) for breach of express warranty and breach of implied warranty in connection with her purchase of a defective 2010 Cadillac SRX. Shelly Newman filed a complaint against GM after her attempts to have various defects in her vehicle repaired by an authorized GM dealership failed. Ms. Newman contacted Krohn & Moss, Ltd., Consumer Law Center® a Chicago law firm that has handled over 45,000 cases since its inception in 1995, seeking to enforce her rights as a consumer. Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® initially contacted GM in writing seeking a resolution to Ms. Newman’s case without having to seek court intervention. However, efforts to resolve this “lemon law” dispute were unsuccessful and ultimately the case proceeded to trial.

In reaching the verdict, the jury found that GM had been provided a “reasonable number of attempts” to repair Ms. Newman’s vehicle but failed to do so. The jury awarded Ms. Newman $7,000.00 in damages representing how much she overpaid for her vehicle due to its defects along with the aggravation of being forced to live with the problems. As a result of the verdict in Ms. Newman’s favor, Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® was also able to seek and receive payment for its attorneys’ fees from GM as is required by various state and federal laws after prevailing in a “lemon law” case. Eric Kaczander of Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® who was the lead trial attorney for Ms. Newman in commenting on the jury’s verdict stated, “This verdict sends a message to all manufacturers that they need to stand behind their products and the excuse that they are ‘working on a fix’ for the very product they manufactured and profited from is unacceptable.” Mr. Kaczander can be reached by calling Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® at (312)578-9428, extension 274 or e-mail Mr. Kaczander directly at ekaczander @ consumerlawcenter . com.

For more information concerning this case, please reference Tazewell County, Circuit Clerk 10thJudicial Circuit of Illinois, Case No. 10 LM 393.

The law firm of Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center®, was founded in 1995 by attorneys Adam Krohn and Gregory Moss, providing legal representation to consumers with defective vehicles and products, consumer fraud concentrating in auto fraud claims such as odometer setbacks, auto dealer financing scams and vehicle history misrepresentations, FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act) and FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) violations. Visit the Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® website at or you can contact our firm at 888 MY-LEMON (888-695-3666), toll free from anywhere in the US.


Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® is pleased to comply with state regulations concerning client statements and testimonials:

In order for you to see our client video or read our client statements, please click the green button below. You will be taken directly to the video or client statements.

If you are interested in viewing information about the lawyer/firm’s past results and testimonials about the lawyer/firm, please read and acknowledge the information below.

The information in this section contains information about the lawyer/firm’s past results, testimonials about the lawyer/firm, and statements regarding the lawyer/firm’s quality. The information has not been reviewed or approved by Bar Associations of the states in which the law firm practices.

The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and testimonials have been provided.

All results of cases handled by the lawyer/firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.

The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by the lawyer/firm or of the experience of all clients or others with the lawyer/firm. Past results are no guarantee of future results. Every case is different, and each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.

The testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.