Brunner v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation

Client Name: Mr. Brunner
State: Missouri
Rating: 5

Mr. Brunner purchased a new 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee from McCune Chrysler in January 2002 for $28,050.40. He began experiencing a drive belt noise from the engine area in November 2002 and returned to Chrysler’s authorized dealerships for repair. Mr. Brunner continued to have problems with a drive belt noise from the engine, along with a scratching noise and illumination of the check engine light. In addition, Mr. Brunner experienced steering and suspension problem, including a rubbing noise from the vehicle when driving over bumps and a groaning noise from the steering column on turns. Mr. Brunner returned to Chrysler’s dealers on ten separate occasions for his concerns with the vehicle, with the last repair visit occurring on December 2004 when the vehicle had 45,145 miles on it. The case proceeded to jury trial in August 2005 in San Diego County. The Defendant, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, argued that Mr. Brunner’s vehicle did not contain any defects and that none of the problems complained of were substantial in nature. The jury awarded Mr. Brunner the entire cost of his vehicle, $28,050.40.

Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® is pleased to comply with state regulations concerning client statements and testimonials:

In order for you to see our client video or read our client statements, please click the green button below. You will be taken directly to the video or client statements.

If you are interested in viewing information about the lawyer/firm’s past results and testimonials about the lawyer/firm, please read and acknowledge the information below.

The information in this section contains information about the lawyer/firm’s past results, testimonials about the lawyer/firm, and statements regarding the lawyer/firm’s quality. The information has not been reviewed or approved by Bar Associations of the states in which the law firm practices.

The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and testimonials have been provided.

All results of cases handled by the lawyer/firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.

The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by the lawyer/firm or of the experience of all clients or others with the lawyer/firm. Past results are no guarantee of future results. Every case is different, and each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.

The testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.