Free Case Review
During your free case review, we’ll discuss your vehicle, the defect in question, and any repair attempts you’ve made. We’ll also cover the claim process in-depth and answer any questions you have.
Our Lawyers Fight For You
Over 25 years of experience
No attorney’s fees or out-of-pocket expenses
10,000 Success Stories in California alone
California’s Lemon Law, also known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, helps consumers who have purchased or leased a defective vehicle. Defects must be covered by the manufacturer’s warranty and must persist after a reasonable number of repair attempts. If your vehicle qualifies, you’ll be entitled to a refund, a replacement vehicle, or a cash settlement.
In some situations, you may recover Civil Penalties in addition to a refund or replacement vehicle. These remedies can be double the amount of your underlying recovery, making your total compensation as much as three times what you paid for your vehicle! Plus, when we prevail, the manufacturer must pay your attorney’s fees and compensate you for your defective vehicle.
You Could Be Entitled To A Refund, Replacement Vehicle, Or Cash Settlement.
Civil Penalties Can Triple Your Recovery Amount.
The Manufacturer Pays Your Attorney’s Fees When We Prevail.
All You Have To Do Is Call, And Our Lawyers Take Care Of The Rest!
To qualify for compensation under the California Lemon Law, your vehicle must have a defect that substantially impairs its use, value, or safety. Additionally, this defect must be covered by the manufacturer’s original warranty. This defect must persist after you’ve provided the auto manufacturer with a reasonable number of attempts to repair it.
Typically, the law defines “a reasonable number of repair attempts” as two to four, depending on the severity of the defect. Additionally, if the vehicle is out of service for repairs for a total of 30 or more business days, it’s presumed to be a lemon.
Take The Free Lemon TestNew and Used Vehicles
Motorcycle
Cars
Boats
Passenger Truck
Parts of RVs
Under the California Lemon Law, your vehicle’s defect must have surfaced within 18 months or 18,000 miles of the original sale date. From this point, you have four years to file a claim.
That said, we can still file cases under the Federal Lemon Law after this window closes. However, the sooner you act, the greater your chance of a successful recovery. If you purchased or leased a vehicle that’s not working as it should, we recommend acting as soon as possible.
18
Months
OR
18,000
Miles
of the original purchase,
whichever comes first
If your vehicle is ruled a lemon, you typically get to choose between three main types of compensation—a refund, replacement vehicle, or cash settlement.
Our lawyers will also fight to recover additional compensation for your trouble, such as Civil Penalties and attorney’s fees.
The California Lemon Law covers used cars as well as new ones.
It includes pre-owned and refurbished vehicles purchased or leased through a retailer.
Private party sales are covered by the Federal Lemon Law
The vehicle’s defect must still be covered by the manufacturer’s warranty or an authorized extended warranty.
Turning Your Lemon into Lemonade
If your vehicle is ruled a lemon, you typically get to choose between a refund, replacement vehicle, or cash settlement. Whatever option you choose, the compensation will include everything you’ve paid for the vehicle, including: sales tax, license and registration costs, and financing charges!
In addition to the refund or replacement vehicle you receive, you might also be entitled to Civil Penalties against the manufacturer, if they willingly broke the California Lemon Law. These penalties can be up to twice the size of your refund.
When you win a lemon law case in California, the manufacturer is required to pay your attorney’s fees. Thus, consumers seeking representation for their lemon should never have to pay for an attorney out-of-pocket!
Although there is no fixed rate of compensation, you can expect a reasonable recovery if your vehicle doesn’t work as it should. Lemon settlements in California typically vary from $5,000 to over $100,000 and are influenced by several factors like the car’s make, model, age, purchase price, warranty agreement, and mileage.
We’ve helped over 50,000 people hold automobile manufacturers responsible for the lemons they sold.
Our law firm has a 99% success rate, and the majority of our clients collect compensation without ever stepping foot in court.
We offer free case reviews and only collect fees when we prevail.
When we prevail, we hold the manufacturer responsible for your attorney’s fees so you don’t have to pay.
During your free case review, we’ll discuss your vehicle, the defect in question, and any repair attempts you’ve made. We’ll also cover the claim process in-depth and answer any questions you have.
If your case qualifies, we’ll get to work building your case and taking the steps necessary to prepare for a claim. This typically starts with us notifying the auto manufacturer in writing about the defect and giving them one final attempt to remedy the problem.
If the manufacturer is unsuccessful, we will file a claim and enter into arbitration. In 99% of cases, we’re able to settle during arbitration. This means the manufacturer will pay you the compensation you’re owed, and you never have to step foot in court!
At the end of a successful claim, you get to spend your money on celebrating rather than paying attorney’s fees! This is because the California Lemon Law has a fee-shifting provision that forces auto manufacturers to pick up the attorney’s tab when you prevail.
Don’t Wait Another Day to Collect the Compensation You’re Owed
No, you may file a claim directly against the automobile manufacturer without help from an attorney. However, we’re often able to secure far better settlements for our clients than the ones they might collect on their own. Retaining our counsel costs you nothing, means less work for you, and greatly increases your chances of success.
Since 1995, the lemon law lawyers at Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® have helped over 60,000 consumers settle their lemon law disputes with automobile manufacturers. We also have an A+ rating with the Better Business Bureau. So no, you don’t need to hire a lawyer for your lemon law case, but there are numerous disadvantages to filing on your own.
NOTHING! California’s Lemon Law includes a fee-shifting provision that holds the manufacturer responsible for your legal fees when you win your case. And at Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center®, we don’t charge for our services unless you prevail. It’s common for other firms to charge their clients for filing fees and other costs related to the case. But our California clients pay nothing out-of-pocket.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
In the express language of the Song-Beverly and Tanner Consumer Protection Act (California’s Lemon Law), the phrase “four (4) repair attempts within 18 months or 18,000 miles” is often misunderstood as a requirement for vehicles to qualify as lemons. But it is possible to successfully pursue cases that do not meet these requirements.
The California Lemon Law provides that a consumer may be entitled to a refund or replacement of their vehicle if the manufacturer is unable or unwilling to repair the vehicle within a reasonable number of attempts. The Lemon Law presumes that a reasonable number of attempts have occurred if the vehicle has been subject to repair four (4) times for the same non-conformity within 18 months or 18,000 miles, whichever occurs first. But this is only a presumption.
A consumer may still qualify for lemon law remedies if they do not meet this presumption. In fact, many of our former and current clients have vehicles that qualify for the refund/replacement remedy without meeting this presumption. Moreover, several consumers have vehicles that qualify for the repurchase/replacement remedy even when their problems occurred after a year or 18,000 miles.
To be eligible for compensation, the California Lemon Law requires that the manufacturer is unable or unwilling to repair the vehicle within a reasonable number of attempts. The Lemon Law presumes that a reasonable number of attempts have occurred if the vehicle has been subject to repair four (4) times for the same non-conformity within 18 months or 18,000 miles, whichever occurs first. But this is only a presumption.
A consumer may still qualify for lemon law remedies if they do not meet this presumption. In fact, many of our former and current clients have vehicles that qualify for the refund/replacement remedy without meeting this presumption. Moreover, several consumers have vehicles that qualify for the repurchase/replacement remedy even when their problems occurred after a year or 18,000 miles.
If a vehicle manufacturer fails to repair a warrantied defect after a reasonable number of attempts, the California Lemon Law entitles the consumer to a refund or replacement vehicle. In most cases, the first step in filing a claim is to notify the manufacturer of your intention to do so. If you have a strong case, the manufacturer may offer a settlement at this point.
Otherwise, the next step is generally to present the case to an arbitration board, which can be done remotely by submitting the relevant documents. The board will review the case and issue its opinion. If the consumer is not satisfied with the arbitrators’ decision, they may then file a lawsuit.
At Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center®, more than 99% of our cases settle before going to trial. So even if we do file suit, manufacturers almost always offer acceptable settlements before we need to take it further. Regardless of when the offer arrives, only the consumer can decide whether or not to accept it. We’ll advise you, but the decision is yours to make.
You have four years from the date of the breach of warranty to file a lawsuit under the Song-Beverly Act (California Lemon Law). In other words, you have four years from the date of the first failed repair attempt.
Typically, the law defines “a reasonable number of repair attempts” as two to four, depending on the severity of the defect. Additionally, if the vehicle is out of service for repairs for a total of 30 or more business days, it’s presumed to be unreasonable and qualifies as a lemon.
In November 2024, the California Supreme Court altered protections for used cars under the California Lemon Law, limiting the consumer’s ability to demand a refund or replacement vehicle in these cases.
However, while the California Supreme Court has narrowed the scope of what a consumer may recover under the California Lemon Law (Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act), it did not eliminate the consumer’s right to recover damages.
If you bought a used car that turned out to be defective, you may still pursue claims for money damages and attorney’s fees. Additionally, you may have recourse under California breach of warranty laws and the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.
If the vehicle manufacturer has opted in to California’s AB 1755 fast‑track program, you must file a lemon law claim within one year after your vehicle’s express warranty expires or within six years after the vehicle’s original delivery date, whichever comes first.
If the manufacturer has not opted in to this program, you have up to four years after the defect surfaces to file a claim. Additionally, the Federal Lemon Law affords you up to four years to file a claim from the time your vehicle’s warranty was breached.
A vehicle qualifies for the Lemon Law in California if it has a significant defect that affects its use, value, or safety, and the manufacturer doesn’t fix it after a reasonable number of attempts. This generally means four tries for the same issue, two attempts for the same safety defect, or 30+ total days waiting on repairs.
The California Lemon Law holds manufacturers responsible for defective vehicles. Under the law, car manufacturers who fail to repair defects after a reasonable number of attempts (or a reasonable timeframe) must provide the consumer with a refund or replacement vehicle. The law applies to most passenger vehicles covered by a new-vehicle warranty, with some exceptions.
To meet the requirements of the California Lemon Law, your vehicle must be under the manufacturer’s original warranty and suffer a defect that substantially impairs the vehicle’s use, value, or safety. If the manufacturer fails to repair the issue after 2-4 attempts, or the vehicle awaits repairs for 30 or more days, it is presumed to be a lemon.
Filing a lemon law claim on your own can be extremely challenging and time-consuming. That’s why, while it is possible to file a lemon law claim yourself, most people choose to hire an attorney.
The California Lemon Law and other consumer laws allow you to recover your attorney’s fees from the manufacturer if you prevail. This means, in many cases, you can hire a lawyer without upfront costs.
The lawyers at Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® have decades of experience helping consumers level the playing field against some of the world’s largest corporations. To file a lemon law claim in California, our lawyers will start by gathering all necessary documentation, including repair records, warranty documents, repair orders with service dates, the purchase or lease contract, and vehicle registration. This paperwork is crucial to prove your defect started under warranty and that the dealer had reasonable opportunities to fix it.
They will then send a formal written notice to the manufacturer on your behalf, requesting a buyback or replacement under the California Lemon Law. Their notice will include the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), a detailed description of the defects and repair history, and a clear request for repurchase or replacement. They will be sure to send the notice to the correct address or the required form to send this notice. They will also counsel you on exactly what you are entitled to recover and advise you on what to do during the time period your claim is pending. They will also conduct all necessary discovery to obtain the documents the car manufacturers don’t want you to see, including their internal technical service bulletins that contain admissions of vehicle defects.
After we send your notice, the manufacturer may respond by offering to settle, requesting additional repairs, or denying your claim. Our attorneys will contact you at this stage to discuss the settlement offer of next steps if an offer is not made. Depending on the manufacturer, you may also be required to participate in early mediation under the state’s fast-track dispute resolution program (introduced in AB 1755). If your claim isn’t resolved at this stage, you can proceed by filing a lawsuit, which our attorneys will handle for you.
Don’t go it alone against an automobile manufacturer that has limitless resources to defend against your case. Hire an experienced law firm with over 60,000 cases under its belt, like Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center®. We’ll help you get the relief you’re owed.
California’s Lemon Law allows a consumer to recover the full purchase price of what they paid for a vehicle, including sales tax, finance interest charges, and other collateral charges. The only subtraction from this buyback formula (or mileage offset) is calculated by multiplying the purchase price by the mileage at the first repair attempt and then dividing that by 120,000 miles (the presumed lifespan of a vehicle in California).
California’s Lemon Law is designed to make sure manufacturers stand behind their warranties.
Once your vehicle meets the legal requirements of being a lemon— meaning it has a warranty-covered defect that substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of the car, and you’ve given the dealer ample opportunity to fix it — your next step is to formally reach out to the manufacturer in writing. This written notice is legally required and should include your contact information, the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), a description of the problem and repair history, and a clear request for a buyback, replacement, or another remedy. The attorneys at Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® will ensure that proper notice is provided to the automobile manufacturer so you do not lose your case on a technicality.
The manufacturer is then given a chance to respond and offer a remedy. If they agree the car qualifies, they’ll arrange either a replacement or a buyback based on a set formula. If they deny the claim or don’t satisfactorily resolve it, you have the right to file a legal claim. Additionally, the law requires the manufacturer to pay your reasonable attorney’s fees if you’re successful.
In California, the automobile manufacturer is responsible for paying the consumer’s attorney’s fees in a successful lemon law case. This means consumers pursuing a lemon law claim should not have to pay attorney’s fees out of pocket if they win or settle their case. The manufacturer is required to cover the consumer’s reasonable attorney’s fees and costs as part of the settlement or judgment.
To file a lemon law claim in California, start by reaching out to an experienced lemon law attorney, since it is not advisable to take on a car manufacturer on your own. Working with a lawyer makes the process easier and increases your chances of success. Under the state lemon law’s fee-shifting provision, the manufacturer is required to cover your attorney’s fees when you prevail, making hiring a lawyer all the more worthwhile.
Your lawyer will help you complete all the necessary steps, including gathering documentation, sending a formal written notice to the manufacturer, entering mediation (if required), filing a lemon lawsuit (if necessary), and fighting for appropriate compensation.
The Lemon Law presumes your car is a lemon if problems arise within the first 18 months or 18,000 miles, making your case easier to prove. But you can still file a claim after that, as long as the defect first appeared while the car was under warranty. Keep in mind that you only have up to one year after the warranty expires (or six years after delivery, whichever comes first) to file a claim if the manufacturer has opted in to California’s AB 1755 fast‑track program. Otherwise, you have up to four years after the defect surfaces to file a claim.
In California, the statute of limitations for filing a lemon law claim is four years after the vehicle defect first surfaces. However, if the manufacturer opts in to AB 1755, you have one year after the warranty ends or six years from the delivery date—whichever is earlier. It’s crucial to file your claim within this timeframe, as waiting longer can jeopardize your ability to pursue legal action.
No, the California Lemon Law only applies to sales by dealers or manufacturers. Private party purchases don’t qualify under the Song‑Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, but the Federal Lemon Law can sometimes provide an avenue for legal recourse if the vehicle you purchased is covered by the balance of a warranty provided by a car dealer or manufacturer.
A California Lemon Law case can take anywhere from a few months to over a year, depending on the circumstances. Hiring an experienced lemon law attorney can help move the process along and take the burden off your shoulders.
The California Lemon Law covers new vehicles with original manufacturer warranties, including:
We don't get paid unless we win your case!
Free Case ReviewKrohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® is pleased to comply with state regulations concerning client statements and testimonials:
In order for you to see our client video or read our client statements, please click the green button below. You will be taken directly to the video or client statements.
If you are interested in viewing information about the lawyer/firm’s past results and testimonials about the lawyer/firm, please read and acknowledge the information below.
The information in this section contains information about the lawyer/firm’s past results, testimonials about the lawyer/firm, and statements regarding the lawyer/firm’s quality. The information has not been reviewed or approved by Bar Associations of the states in which the law firm practices.
The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and testimonials have been provided.
All results of cases handled by the lawyer/firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by the lawyer/firm or of the experience of all clients or others with the lawyer/firm. Past results are no guarantee of future results. Every case is different, and each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.
The testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.