Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® is pleased to comply with state regulations concerning client statements and testimonials:

In order for you to see our client video or read our client statements, please click the green button below. You will be taken directly to the video or client statements.

If you are interested in viewing information about the lawyer/firm’s past results and testimonials about the lawyer/firm, please read and acknowledge the information below.

The information in this section contains information about the lawyer/firm’s past results, testimonials about the lawyer/firm, and statements regarding the lawyer/firm’s quality. The information has not been reviewed or approved by Bar Associations of the states in which the law firm practices.

You should know that:

The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and testimonials have been provided.

All results of cases handled by the lawyer/firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.

The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by the lawyer/firm or of the experience of all clients or others with the lawyer/firm. Past results are no guarantee of future results. Every case is different, and each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.

The testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.

Client Success Story

Medina, Nomar v. American Honda Motor Company

-Medina Nomar, California

Mr. Medina purchased a new 2003 Honda Accord from Penske Honda in August 2003 for $23,725.18. At 776 miles, Mr. Medina began to experience problems with the vehicle drifting to the left and right. He also experienced a rough idle in the vehicle and a ticking noise from the engine compartment. He returned to Honda’s dealers to address these concerns. Despite repair attempts made by the dealer, Mr. Medina was forced to return to Honda’s dealers for these same concerns on sixteen different occasions. The case proceeded to trial in San Bernardino County in August 2006. Defendant, American Honda Motor Company, alleged that the vehicle did not contain any defects and that the vehicle was repaired in a reasonable time. The jury awarded Mr. Medina a full refund of the purchase price of the vehicle, $23,725.18.


Go Back
email phone